#Free itunes music youtube gangnam style download
He brought up the question of how illegal it is to download a song for free? The answer depends on personal understanding of ethics, yet there is “a sharp dissonance between the law as perceived by the public and the moral impact of the law on conduct” (144). Halpern stated in his article Copyright Law and the Challenge of Digital Technology, “technology that makes access so easy also greatly aids copying”, especially in the “digital environment” (143). Now let’s think of this, is YouTube music videos’ Copyright Infringement unethical? Is it totally harmful to the original artists and the labeling company?ĭigital technology has been developed so rapidly that today all kinds of information can be accessed in seconds simply with a click of a mouse. There were also other music label companies experienced Copyright issue with YouTube music videos, such as Universal Music. In December 2009, Warner Music Videos finally returned to the world’s largest video website, after the two sides reached an agreement of sharing the advertising revenue for the music labels. Thousands of videos vanished suddenly, including those that were incorporated into home videos that YouTubers made. For instance, the country’s top 4 labeled company Warner Music removed its videos from YouTube due to some licensing problems. However, YouTube’s great success is not exceptional in the Copyright Law.
Nearly 4 billion music videos are viewed on YouTube every day.
#Free itunes music youtube gangnam style free
No wonder why most people choose FREE music from YouTube or other websites such as Spotify, Playlist, Jango, Mowline, Grooveshark, etc. They protect the profit of artists and their parent companies by asking music amateurs to pay for 99¢ or $1.99 per song they download or few more dollars for music videos. Unlike Google’s YouTube, Apple’s iTunes seems to be more cautious about the Copyright issue. YouTube not only makes music sharing much more efficient and easier, it also has enormous music videos from different genres in its library in addition to providing visual pleasure to its viewers that Napster lacks. YouTube on the other hand updated this service into a new media platform that enabled thousands and thousands of viewers share the same music video at the same time. Why YouTube (2005) is the world’s dominant music force, but not its preceding competitors like Napster (1999) and iTunes (2001)?Īlthough Napster took an earlier action of allowing its users exchange free music in MP3 format online, it was only limited to peer-to-peer file sharing (two at a time). YouTube music videos are convenient and helpful for both the creators and viewers of the artwork.
Free music videos on YouTube (subsidiary of Google), including those of original artists published by entertainment companies and those that are recreated or covered by ordinary people, infringe the Copyright of the celebrities and their parent companies however, YouTube also provides a platform for everyone in the global village to be involved in artistic production and reproduction, simultaneously benefiting the original artists by advertising and spreading the fame.
0 kommentar(er)
